This post is the third installment of a weekly series previewing the topics that will be discussed at CNM’s May 18th Nonprofit Conference: Bridge to Excellence. Click here to register for this exciting day long learning event featuring keynote speaker Dan Pallotta, author of
Uncharitable.
Michael Kipp has been a principal in businesses as diverse as banking, health care and internet commerce. He has worked with nearly 100 corporate, association and nonprofit organizations on board development. He is leading the session, Volunteer Ownership: Rethinking the Nonprofit Board at the Conference.
Road to the Conference: Featured Presenter, Michael Kipp
Board work is frequently characterized by ceremony, instinct, and unfounded assumption. People involve themselves for all manner of reasons: they believe in a cause or have written a check; they want to make a difference, or “change the world”; they are advocates committed to a political or social cause; they want to make connections, associate with “the right people” or those who share their interests; their lives have been marked by a personal or family challenge captured in the organization’s charter. The passion that powers nonprofits has equal power to handicap them.
Then there are the intersecting roles of volunteerism, fund raising and governance…rarely kept in balance and frequently distorted by history, circumstances and the complex mix of motives and assumptions cataloged above. The net impact is that board members struggle between leaning back and leaning in. It takes time and experience to grasp that governance is a form of ownership—an idea worthy of closer examination since the success, significance, and even survival of nonprofits depends so heavily upon the quality of their “owners”.
Directors are not managers. Governance should not be a substitute for staff deficiencies. Weak boards should never be tolerated with the excuse that “…after all, we’re just volunteers; we’ve got real jobs, you know…” Nor should board members “dial down” in deference to the “professionals” as sometimes happens in treatment settings with doctors, educational environments with teachers, associations with legacy members, and within the sub-industries that grow up around services to special needs populations. This kind of self-effacement engenders passivity and sets the stage for specialized employees to determine policy and even set aspirations on behalf of their “owners”. The reality is that while they may be highly trained, well-motivated, and in command of the expertise to pursue the mission, the organization is not theirs to govern.
Continue reading ‘Road to the Conference: Featured Presenter, Michael Kipp’


Recent Comments